November 6, Kathmandu. The National Independent Party, which is main in 11 locations in keeping with the direct election system of the House of Representatives, is within the third place by gathering 50,000 votes in keeping with the proportional system until Tuesday night. The leaders of RSVP, who had been excited by the preliminary outcomes of the vote counting, at the moment are saying that they are going to type a authorities underneath their very own management.
Chairman Ravi Lamichhane’s constituencies in Chitwan-2, spokesperson of the Rashtriya Swatantra Party Dr. Conversation with Mukul Dhakal on this regard:
What is your response to the preliminary outcomes of the vote depend?
We perceive this as the start of the revolution. We have taken the vote we acquired as a sophisticated type of democracy. It has given the message that nobody is above the individuals.
According to your estimation, the votes coming within the direct and proportional system are the identical or completely different?
We anticipated it to be significantly better than this. If some individuals had believed in us, we might have been the primary social gathering.
Some individuals who have earned skilled {and professional} success and social repute didn’t belief us and went to contest the elections alone. Katip refused our request and refused to enter politics. Had it not been for this, we might have been in a a lot stronger position than we at the moment are.
According to the preliminary outcomes, it’s seen that your social gathering may be essential for the formation of the federal government within the parliament. Who do you go along with?
How many seats different events get and the way they get them will decide whether or not they are going to go to the federal government or not. Counting of votes in lots of locations is but to be executed. Counting of proportional votes has not began all over the place.
Therefore, our understanding is that if the votes are proportional as we predict, the federal government might be shaped underneath our management. If this doesn’t occur, we are going to focus on and determine to go to the federal government or keep within the opposition.
You went to the election with out making all of the structures of the social gathering, now that it’s coming as a nationwide social gathering, the inner construction of the social gathering must also be accomplished, proper?
Yes, we’re getting ready for it. Our structure says to not type fraternal organizations. We at the moment are a mass-based or voter-based social gathering. Our social gathering has a construction from the ward degree to the middle, however there are not any fraternal organizations or skilled organizations.
There was no election in your social gathering to elect the chief of the parliamentary social gathering, now who would be the chief of the parliamentary social gathering?
Without the election, we requested those that have an interest to be the chief of the parliamentary social gathering to use. Due to the election, we have now not been in a position to examine these petitions. According to the structure of our social gathering, the chief of the parliamentary social gathering must be elected by the bulk. Now we put together for this matter.
Isn’t the Speaker Ravi Lamichhane the chief of the parliamentary social gathering?
We can not determine this individual. In our social gathering, the election determines the chief of the parliamentary social gathering. The variety of candidates can be essential when going to the election for the chief of the parliamentary social gathering.
In our estimation, greater than two individuals won’t contest the election of the parliamentary social gathering. Only one individual can come to the election of the chief of the parliamentary social gathering. Even if one individual comes or two individuals come, we select the chief of the parliamentary social gathering by elections.