The defendants are a psychologist and a social employee from an Office of Attention to Victims of Crime The Prosecutor’s Office requests for each sentences of three and a half years in jail, in addition to an 18-month effective for a criminal offense of discovery and disclosure of secrets and techniques The defendants have assured that they obtained many calls asking for assist after broadcasting the docuseries of Rocío Carrasco
This is how the 2 defendants have pronounced themselves, one among them a psychologist and the opposite, an interim social employee in an Office of Attention to Victims of Crime.
The Prosecutor’s Office has made its conclusions definitive and requests for them two separate sentences of three and a half years in jail, in addition to an 18-month effective at a price of 10 euros a day and 6 years of absolute disqualification for a criminal offense of discovery and disclosure of secrets and techniques. . For its half, the protection claims the acquittal by not seeing a criminal offense, because it has alluded to the authorization of the officers to seek the advice of Viogén and has framed the motion in “the train of his features”. He additionally sees no hurt.
Rocio Carrasco docuseries
The occasions date again to March 22, 2021, after the published of the primary chapter of the docuseries ‘Rocío, inform the reality to remain alive’, broadcast by Telecinco.
The two defendants have defined that the day after the episode was broadcast, they obtained quite a few calls on the workplace from ladies who claimed that they had been experiencing a state of affairs much like that of Rocío Carrasco and requested for recommendation.
One of the officers, the psychologist, defined that he went to Viogén, an software on which he had authorization to enter, with the intention of orienting himself with the circumstances they had been attending. “In explicit, I used to be fascinated by discovering out if there was any safety order in Rocío’s file and if some sort of surveillance unit had been assigned,” he stated.
“What I wanted to know – he continued – is that if Rocío was a sufferer of gender violence and if, due to this fact, she had been assigned a degree of danger and a surveillance unit. Thus, she may advise different doable victims who stated that they the identical factor occurred and that they had been in the identical state of affairs”.
The official, who has insisted that he accessed the information solely for skilled causes, has indicated that to entry Viogén he didn’t have to bypass passwords or hack something and has denied that he did it for enjoyable or leisure: “I did it within the train of my duties”, he repeated.
In this regard, the president of the court docket has requested the defendant to clarify himself once more since he didn’t perceive why he wanted to seek the advice of Rocío Carrasco’s file to, as a psychologist, advise different doable victims. And the defendant has had an affect: “Knowing if in that case there was some degree of danger could possibly be helpful to grasp if the doable victims who known as us may even have attributed the identical degree of danger. I may advocate that they make the pertinent criticism to acquire it, ” has said.
“It was not executed deliberately”
For her half, the opposite accused official has repeated -also in her final word- that the session with Viogén “was not executed with any intention that was not skilled”. He defined that in his case, on the day of the occasions, he obtained a name from a sufferer, who had already been handled, who advised him that she had felt recognized with what had been denounced on the tv program associated to violence. vicar and what Rocío Carrasco had recounted.
Thus, he has indicated that he entered Viogén “to contextualize the state of affairs and see what was occurring”, whereas including that “I may by no means have predicted that making that question would set off these penalties”.
Several witnesses appeared through the trial, together with the one who was a companion of the defendants and a lawyer within the Victims’ Office, who has corroborated the quite a few calls they obtained after the docuseries from victims who felt recognized.
Asked how the officers may assist these victims with the session of the file, the witness indicated that “it was putting that every one the victims, who introduced a distinct downside, felt recognized with Rocío. So, it was to grasp what they had been needing. Something had occurred to that particular person – Rocío Jurado’s daughter – that had made everybody open their eyes. We needed to grasp why the victims recognized together with her,” he repeated.
For his half, the top of the Administration’s job administration service has indicated, as a witness, that he was answerable for instructing the disciplinary file of the accused, though he couldn’t end it as a result of judicial proceedings started.
In this manner, he may solely course of a associated file in Alicante on which the prosecutor didn’t see a criminal offense. In this regard, she defined that it was an analogous case through which the official assured that she had consulted the file because of the enhance in calls from individuals with signs much like Rocío Carrasco.
After finding out this particular case, the witness said that he discovered no specific limitation that such a case couldn’t be consulted. “I didn’t discover something within the manuals that said {that a} file couldn’t be accessed if it was not associated to the process. I didn’t discover it, though I’m not saying that it doesn’t exist,” he identified. The witness didn’t see dangerous religion on this case and believed that the official consulted Viogén within the train of her place.