Former CUP deputy Anna Gabriel
The Supreme Court (TS) has despatched the case of the previous deputy of the CUP in Parliament Anna Gabriel, prosecuted for an alleged crime of disobedience for her alleged participation within the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (DUI) of Catalonia, to the Provincial Court of Barcelona contemplating that it’s the competent physique on condition that the chief now not enjoys the standing of registered.
In an order issued this Wednesday, the Criminal Chamber has confirmed the abstract order and has declined its jurisdiction to proceed with the process, for which it has agreed to refer it to Catalonia.
The choice takes place after final September the investigating Justice of the Peace Pablo Llarena concluded the abstract concerning Gabriel after taking his assertion. The course of associated to the previous CUP deputy was reactivated in July final yr, when the chief voluntarily appeared earlier than the Supreme Court after getting back from Switzerland, the place she was on the run after being processed in 2018.
In his assertion in court docket, Gabriel denied having dedicated an alleged crime of disobedience for his alleged involvement within the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (DUI) of Catalonia. When he left, he advised the media that he anticipated the case to be filed or despatched to a court docket in Barcelona.
According to authorized sources current on the interrogation c, Gabriel testified for just below half an hour earlier than Judge Llarena, the Prosecutor’s Office, the State Attorney’s Office and the favored prosecution exercised by Vox. The chief refused to reply the questions from the authorized providers of the State and people of the formation led by Santiago Abascal.
The identical sources specified that the Public Ministry requested the previous deputy if in 2017 she obtained any requirement from the Constitutional Court warning her that she couldn’t promote a parliamentary initiative that may result in the independence of Catalonia. Gabriel stated that she didn’t, that she didn’t obtain any notification and that, due to this fact, she wouldn’t have dedicated the crime of disobedience attributed to her.