Thus, the Supreme Court has dominated that, “consequently, sustaining the confinement of those that examined unfavourable within the PCR, pending their affirmation, was a measure adjusted to the precept of proportionality if, as well as, we relate it to the peculiarity of the disaster of COVID-19, the expertise of those that have just lately returned from their end-of-year journeys and the precise scenario of these affected”.
That is why the Court has dismissed the enchantment filed by the Public Prosecutor, noting that “it’s not disputed within the proceedings that quite a few positives have been rising amongst those that had already returned after ending their keep in Mallorca” and that, as well as, “There was a rational foundation to presume that those that nonetheless remained on the island may very well be contaminated and transmit their contagion, dispersing the virus to different territories, which was affordable to assume in view of the expertise of the just lately returned, as a result of sort of actions carried out and the way in which these affected behave on these end-of-year journeys to Mallorca”.