The Supreme Court prosecutors who accused Oriol Junqueras and the remainder of the 1-O independence leaders have requested the Chamber to keep up the sentences for aggravated embezzlement for many who have been convicted of it. It additionally requests that the previous sedition be thought-about a criminal offense of aggravated public dysfunction, in keeping with the enchantment to which NIUS has agreed.
In the crime of embezzlement, the revenue motive should not be understood as taking the cash into the pocket: “it doesn’t require the enrichment of the writer, however, in any case, the unlawful lower of public funds or items assimilated to them”, they are saying the prosecutors of the method, who interpret the embezzlement reform alongside the identical traces as Judge Pablo Llarena does.
The Public Ministry had already mirrored the identical place in its response to Llarena’s indictment of Carles Puigdemont; in a decree of the State Attorney General, issued this morning; and now they accomplish that of their allegation to the courtroom presided over by Manuel Marchena. The one who condemned Junqueras and the remaining.
In what they don’t agree with the Justice of the Peace is in limiting the previous crime of sedition, repealed, to one in all disobedience. They insist that they have to be saved sentenced for aggravated public dysfunction.