The PP has recalled that the parliamentary teams that make up the coalition authorities (PSOE and Unidas Podemos) have processed the invoice to repeal sedition and scale back embezzlement, “via which they intend to reform two natural legal guidelines -one of the Constitutional Court and one other from the CGPJ– through addition amendments”.
In this letter, the ‘widespread’ have connected the minutes of the assembly of the Bureau of the Congressional Justice Commission, wherein it’s acknowledged that the legal professionals assured that there are amendments that might “not have a fabric connection” along with not saving “minimal homogeneity relationship” with the proposed regulation. According to the formation led by Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the president of the Commission “ignored these warnings and rejected the request of the GPP to not embody mentioned amendments.”
The “populares” additionally point out that, though the opinion of the invoice was voted within the plenary session of Congress, their request for amparo was associated to the parliamentary course of, “for which purpose the switch of the initiative to the Senate to proceed its parliamentary course doesn’t stop the High Court from appearing”.
“With this, the GPP intends to defend the elemental rights of parliamentarians so that each one ensures are met. This is believing within the rule of regulation and defending it,” they’ve claimed.
In this context, the PP has requested this Friday the Senate Board to cease the processing of the reform of the Criminal Code, which modifies the Constitutional Court, repeals the crime of sedition and adjustments the penalties for embezzlement, and that will probably be carried out within the Upper House subsequent Tuesday, December 20, at some point after the pronouncement of the assure courtroom on the request of the PP to cease the parliamentary course of the norm.
The ‘widespread’ have requested, in a letter to which Europa Press has had entry, the suspension of the processing of the invoice within the Senate, utilizing, among the many arguments, the “apparent fraud of the Law” meaning not processing it as a challenge of regulation to “keep away from the wording of article 561 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary” and “to not accumulate the pertinent experiences from the CGPJ, the Fiscal Council, and the Council of State.”
The parliamentary group led by Javier Maroto has additionally criticized the urgency of the processing as a result of, as he defined, it’s “incomprehensible” that in a reform “so necessary for the safeguarding of our Constitutional system” its processing is prevented “in accordance with the deadlines abnormal”.
However, the TC will maintain a unprecedented plenary session this Monday to handle the PP’s request to cease the parliamentary course of the reform of the courtroom itself.
The determination made by the president of the TC, Pedro González-Trevijano, to droop the extraordinary plenary session that started this Thursday to proceed it subsequent Monday allowed the invoice and the set of amendments that it incorporates to be voted on Thursday within the Congress of the Deputies.
Thus, the choice that the Constitutional Court lastly takes on the very precautionary measures requested by the PP in its attraction for amparo –with which it seeks to cease the parliamentary processing of the amendments that have an effect on the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) and the TC– can have a direct affect on the course of the invoice within the Senate.