The choose didn’t need to launch former deputy Fuentes as a result of threat to the proof, however the prosecutor has not requested imprisonment


The choose understands that each one these circumstances “suggested his entry into jail and never his launch” the order authorizing Fuentes Curbelo to go away his courtroom in freedom, however accused of bribery, falsehood, cash laundering and group membership organized prison Contrary to what the Public Prosecutor maintains, “there’s a hazard of destruction of sources of proof,”

The choose within the Mediator case was in favor of sending former PSOE deputy Juan Bernardo Fuentes Curbelo to jail, contemplating that there’s a threat that he would destroy proof or compromise the investigation together with his extensive community of influences, however she has not been capable of agree on that measure as a result of the one accusation individual, the Prosecutor’s Office, didn’t request it.

In the order authorizing Fuentes Curbelo to go away his courthouse free, however charged with bribery, falsehood, cash laundering and belonging to an organized prison group, Judge María de los Ángeles Lorenzo-Cáceres explains this Wednesday that she permits so be it “by authorized crucial” and “in absolute disagreement” with the Prosecutor’s Office.

The teacher remembers that she is pending “an exhaustive examine of the a number of units”, results and paperwork seized from the detainees within the completely different registers that she has ordered, a job that she believes could also be “affected” by the discharge of the previous socialist deputy , “earlier than the potential of their private relationships.”

For this motive, it stresses that, opposite to what the Public Prosecutor maintains, “there’s a hazard of destruction of sources of proof”, given the “place on the islands” of Juan Bernardo Fuentes Curbelo, a member of probably the most influential households of the PSOE in Fuerteventura, “his hyperlinks with politics and this atmosphere since 1994, his completely different political positions and his in depth relations”.

admission to jail

The choose understands that each one these circumstances “suggested his entry into jail and never his launch, at the least within the present section of this process”, since he fears that the investigation may “be annoyed by the measure of freedom requested and that for authorized crucial this holder can not fail to agree”.

One of the elemental guidelines that govern prison proceedings in Spain is the “accusatory precept”, which means {that a} defendant can’t be sentenced for these crimes of which he isn’t accused (even when a choose observes adequate proof to take action). and, on this case, it determines {that a} measure limiting rights can’t be taken if not one of the events concerned within the case requests it.