The European Prosecutor’s Office archives the investigation into the masks contract linked to Ayuso’s brother


This is the contract for which the PP investigated AyusoThe case file happens after “an exhaustive investigation” after which “it has not been confirmed” that the value paid for the provision of the masks was disproportionateThe European prosecutors made numerous statements, analyzed documentation and verified the authenticity of the pictures of the masks delivered

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO, for its acronym in English) has knowledgeable this Tuesday of the file of the investigation opened for the acquisition of 250,000 masks by the Community of Madrid, a contract value 1.5 million euros linked to Tomás Díaz Ayuso , brother of the Madrid president, Isabel Díaz Ayuso.

The submitting of the case happens after “an exhaustive investigation” after which “it has not been confirmed” that the value paid for the provision of the masks was disproportionate, as reported by the European Prosecutor’s Office itself in a press release.

The choice was made on March 6 by the Permanent Chamber of the EPPO on the proposal of the delegated European prosecutors and in settlement with the supervising European Prosecutor in Spain, Concepción Sabadell.

As defined by the EPPO within the assertion, after assuming the investigation of the contract awarded by the Madrid Health Service of the Community of Madrid (SERMAS) for the acquisition of 250,000 FFP2-3 masks, the European Prosecutors took numerous statements, analyzed documentation and verified the authenticity of the pictures of the delivered masks.

They additionally requested data from numerous entities such because the Tax Agency, SERMAS and the Spanish Association for Standardization and Certification (AENOR); they collected reviews from the Civil Guard and appointed an professional who examined the documentation.

inadequate indications

Finally, the process was filed attributable to “not having ample proof of the fee of a criminal offense”, specifies the European Prosecutor’s Office, which provides that “it has not been confirmed that the value paid for the masks was disproportionate given the standard of the fabric provided and delivered.

Likewise, additionally they don’t consider it has been confirmed that the value had suffered an “undue improve because of the intervention of individuals outdoors the corporate” and so they conclude that it has been confirmed that the transport was paid for by the profitable firm and never by the Community of Madrid.

The proposal of the Delegated European Prosecutors to archive this case has been assessed and confirmed by three European Prosecutors from completely different Member States, as reported by the European group itself.