His lawyer has submitted a letter wherein he denies that he might be prosecuted for embezzlement, as a result of he has by no means been charged He factors out that the decide has modified the details to answer a authorized reform that “he didn’t like” He asks that the case be despatched to Catalonia
131 pages has been utilized by Carles Puigemont’s lawyer, Gonzalo Boye, to refute Judge Llarena’s arguments in his indictment towards Carles Puigdemont. In a letter stuffed with reproaches, the previous president’s lawyer makes it clear that, in his opinion, the Justice of the Peace is finishing up political persecution.
In it, the lawyer rejects the prosecution for critical embezzlement, which Pablo Llarena has primarily based on the essence of revenue. The doc signifies that till now reference to “any kind of revenue motive had by no means been included, which is the idea that the Hon. Magistrate-Instructor contains ad-hoc within the order” issued final week.
For Boye, Llarena has launched the accusation of revenue, earlier than a legislative reform that “he has not preferred”, and for that he accuses him of getting launched “with the mutation of details and regulation, the alleged revenue that will permit , all the time in line with the Excme Magistrate-Instructor, attribute the fee of a criminal offense of embezzlement of public funds in its aggravated modality”.
In addition, the previous president’s protection requests that the case be despatched to the Catalan courts.
To assist his argument, the lawyer responded to Llarena with a sentence drawn up by the Justice of the Peace himself on September 15, 2022, wherein he mentioned that “the order to pay for the works carried out and obtained from an irregular contract” even when it’s a embezzlement crime doesn’t by itself represent one other embezzlement:
“It shouldn’t be possible that the fee of companies irregularly contracted however which have truly been obtained be thought of theft or unjustified, since in any other case it will be a transparent assumption of unfair enrichment for the recipient of the service.” instrumental crime
Beyond that, the writing addresses the truth that embezzlement has gone from being understood as a way of sedition, to considering it as autonomous and likewise aggravated to its most restrict, “one other advert hoc modification,” Boye writes.
“Instrumentalizing the fitting” is one other of the phrases utilized by Puigemont’s protection, which ensures that he will be unable to get it delivered to Spain to be tried by that indictment both.