The Andalusian president acknowledges his “particular sensitivity” with a illness that additionally took his father “with an analogous age to Griñán” The PP, as a personal prosecution, has a interval of three days to rule on the request of the previous Andalusian president to droop his entry into jail to be handled for his prostate most cancers The forensic report recommends that Griñán not go to jail
The president of the Junta de Andalucía, Juanma Moreno, has been in favor of ex-president José Antonio Griñán not going to jail to serve his sentence for the ERE case, as a result of most cancers he’s affected by.
This has been pronounced throughout an informative breakfast of Forum Europe two days after the Provincial Court of Seville transferred to the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and the PP the forensic report ready by the Institute of Legal Medicine (IML) on Griñán’s illness setting a time period of “three days” for them to rule on the request of the previous Andalusian president to droop his entry into jail for being handled for his prostate most cancers.
Moreno recalled that his father died of the identical illness “at an analogous age to Griñán” so he has a “particular sensitivity”. In this sense, the Andalusian president has defined that he can’t be in favor of “as soon as it has been licensed that he has most cancers, he goes to jail. Personally, I am unable to agree with that.”
“If an individual is critically ailing, they must be handled accordingly,” he factors out. “And if the forensic physician says that it might probably solely be correctly handled if he doesn’t go to jail, then he mustn’t go in,” Moreno has defended, acknowledging that “it’s a very powerful illness.”
At the judicial stage
Beyond his private place, he recalled that the judicial course of is “unappealable” within the face of the “most critical corruption case within the historical past of Spain and the place there are nonetheless 100 lawsuits pending”, assured the Andalusian president, who recalled that the The so-called ‘political piece’ of the ERE has gone by way of “16 judges” and has “two remaining sentences, one from the Provincial Court and ratification by the Supreme Court”.
In his opinion, on the judicial stage it has been confirmed that “there has evidently been a duty on the a part of earlier governments that’s unappealable and incontestable” and, consequently, “the choices which were made clearly and forcefully shouldn’t be mentioned extra and at least 16 judges”.