He criticizes that “hoaxes” have been unfold concerning the minister or Garzón by the correct: “Shutting up within the face of a lot hypocrisy doesn’t add up” “He denounces that a number of ministers took benefit of the hoaxes about macro-farms to “hit” Alberto Garzón
Former Vice President of the Government Pablo Iglesias has acknowledged that he’ll vote for Sumar, on condition that Podemos is in that coalition, however has remarked that the pinnacle of Equality, Irene Montero, was “vetoed in a call that can embarrass many for years”, particularly after be attacked by “hoaxes”.
“I’ll go to vote very proud to do it for the candidacy the place my get together (Podemos) is, however shutting up within the face of a lot hypocrisy doesn’t add to or assist anybody keep at house,” he careworn throughout an intervention on Canal Red, the directing tv
As a results of the controversy over the “lies” of the ‘in style’ candidate, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, when saying an interview on TVE that the PP revalued the pensions on the CPI degree, which have been refuted by the journalist Silvia Intxaurrondo and that later the personal political chief certified in networks, Iglesias has recovered an article of his previous the place he alluded to the intensification of “hoaxes” towards Montero and the pinnacle of Consumption, Alberto Garzón.
For instance, he alleged that the chief of the IU additionally suffered an “apparent hoax” with the misrepresentation of his phrases concerning the macro-farms, inflicting “outrage and scandal” that regional leaders of the PSOE “attacked” Garzón and that a number of ministers took benefit of it to hit him .
Then he continued that Montero additionally suffered “hoaxes” concerning the improve in his property or that the previous president of the Government José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero instructed himself that he had “gold mines” in Venezuela, to denounce that the right-wing not makes a “reactionary” interpretation ” of the details that present them with efficient frameworks, however relatively that the technique is just “mendacity” in a “rampant” method in media areas, some even “supposedly progressive”.
Consequences for Garzón and Montero
What’s extra, he has identified that in that article he already identified that this reveals that the “degradation ranges of journalism are sickening to nausea” and that being on the correct is reliable, however the issue is that lies are used towards political leaders.
Then, he questioned what occurred subsequent and launched that “Garzón was kindly invited to not be a candidate for the Sumar coalition and Irene Montero was vetoed in a call that can embarrass many for years.”
“Garzón was kindly invited to not be a candidate and Irene Montero was vetoed in a call that can embarrass many for years” (Pablo Iglesias)
“Today the PSOE and the progressive media are scandalized by the lie. Those of the PSOE who purchased the hoax towards Garzón and the lies towards Irene Montero immediately are anxious as a result of Feijóo and the correct are mendacity”, he has deepened to defend that his place is that ” to fight lies, you could by no means shut up” and say “the reality even when it makes noise”.
Díaz reiterates that he didn’t veto Montero: “It isn’t my fashion”
Precisely this morning, he reaffirmed that he didn’t veto the pinnacle of Equality Irene Montero on Sumar’s electoral lists as a result of “it isn’t his fashion” and insisted that different profiles resembling Garzón or the parliamentarians Jaume Asens and Juantxo López de Uralde don’t repeat this both candidacy, all of them “very useful” individuals for politics.
In truth, he has affirmed that the confluence agreements have been negotiated between the fifteen political forces that make up the coalition that he champions and that this pact, the most important to the left of the PSOE in democracy, was solid with the generosity of its members.
Topics