14 November, Kathmandu. As the counting of direct votes has reached the ultimate stage, the controversy on who will turn into the chief of the parliamentary celebration has already began throughout the Nepali Congress. General Minister Gagan Thapa has already introduced that he’ll contest the election of the parliamentary celebration, together with Ramchandra Paudel, Prakashman Singh, Shekhar Koirala, Kishore Singh Rathore and others have additionally expressed their aspirations to be the chief of the parliamentary celebration. Even if Chairman Sher Bahadur Deuba doesn’t open his mouth, there isn’t a doubt throughout the Congress that he’ll stay the candidate for the chief of the parliamentary celebration.
Elected chief from Kanchanpur-3, Ramesh Akhtar, doesn’t see a substitute for Deuba because the chief of the parliamentary celebration. He claims that Deuba is the one who led the present energy coalition and the necessity to proceed the coalition. In this context, Raghunath Bajgai of Online News had a dialog with the chief author:
Are there many aspirants for the chief of the parliamentary celebration throughout the Congress?
Claiming the chief of the parliamentary celebration is pure. Saying that you’ll make so-and-so the chief of the parliamentary celebration and voting can also be a democratic course of.
Doesn’t it seem to be there might be a contest primarily between the Speaker and the General Minister Gagan Thapa?
In the present state of affairs, if Sher Bahadur Deubaji desires, he’s additionally the chief of the parliamentary celebration and he’s additionally the Prime Minister.
There can also be a risk that Deuba is not going to wish to give a possibility to the brand new one?
If he himself stated I cannot stand up, it’s a totally different matter. However, he could not say.
General Minister Gagan Thapa is main the opinion that management must be handed down throughout the Congress. Why are you reluctant to make a brand new face the chief of the parliamentary celebration and the prime minister?
It is being handed down. Young leaders have turn into common ministers. Gradually, the potential of him (Gagan Thapa) changing into the Prime Minister is getting stronger. But not now.
We have to take a look at the state of affairs. Sher Bahadur Deubaji is the chief of the ruling coalition. The present election is a continuation of the coalition. Again, we now have to maneuver ahead with everybody within the alliance. In order to type the federal government, it’s obligatory to succeed in the bulk. Sher Bahadurji has particular means and effectivity on this.
Therefore, he’s wanted to take care of the alliance and transfer ahead. Since the dignitaries who’ve been elected to the celebration and people who come from the proportional record are additionally in favor of Sher Bahadur Deubaji, he’ll turn into the chief of the parliamentary celebration once more.
Does this imply that if Deuba just isn’t the chief of the parliamentary celebration, the ability coalition will collapse and the political course could also be turned in one other route?
It just isn’t like that, the power to get together with everybody has been seen in Deubasi. Since he’s the chief of the alliance, it signifies that the alliance might be simpler if he continues.
How usually will Deuba be wanted in Nepal’s politics?
He is required to proceed the present energy coalition. The structure, the federal democratic republican system have to be protected by means of the present coalition. He might be wanted so long as this want exists.
What do you say to those that query what number of instances Deuba might be made Prime Minister?
That is set by the state of affairs. Due to the present state of affairs, I’ve been asking Deuba to be the chief of the parliamentary celebration and prime minister.
Are you certain that the present ruling coalition will type the federal government?
I consider that the coalition authorities might be fashioned.
CPN-UML can also be making an attempt to type a authorities, is not it?
Everyone has to arrange. There is little question so far as preparation is anxious. However, I absolutely consider that the alliance will proceed.
When there was a disagreement within the CPN at the moment, UML and Maoists separated. UML additionally didn’t stay united. What do you say to those that are questioning the way forward for the alliance?
If you will have talked about the potential of an alliance between UML and Maoist, then you’ll be able to make sure that it’s a failed alliance. The celebration itself has united by forming an alliance between UML and Maoists. However, that alliance may neither shield the structure, nor may it develop, nor may it shield its personal celebration. If there’s a risk of the identical coalition that has divided his personal celebration into three or 4 elements, then it’s thought-about that the matter just isn’t understood.
Will the Congress be versatile in energy sharing?
Even although the Congress is versatile, it takes the alliance ahead.