The Minister of Equality, Irene Montero
It has been via the abortion legislation and has not had the assist of presidency companions The modification introduced by Junts proposes a reform of article 172 ter of the Penal Code that already reformed on the time the Law of Guarantee of Sexual Freedom
The Plenary Session of Congress has accepted an modification by Junts that proposes a reform of article 172 ter of the Penal Code, which on the time already reformed the Law on Guaranteeing Sexual Freedom, often known as the Law of ‘solely sure is sure’, with the target to toughen the penalties when the picture of minors or folks with disabilities is used with out consent for the creation of false profiles on relationship or pornography web sites.
The Lower House has made this modification via the reform of the Abortion Law that has been debated this Wednesday in plenary. During the session, the Junts spokesperson for Equality, Pilar Calvo, requested for the assist of the vast majority of Congress for this initiative, which lastly had the votes in favor of all parliamentary teams, except PSOE and Unidas Podemos.
Through the Junts modification, the fourth last provision of the Law of ‘solely sure is sure’ has been modified, which, in flip, modified part 5 of article 172 ter of the Penal Code.
“Whoever, with out the consent of its proprietor, makes use of the picture of an individual to make commercials or open false profiles on social networks, contact pages or any technique of public dissemination, inflicting the identical scenario of harassment, harassment or humiliation, will likely be punished with a jail sentence of three months to at least one yr or a positive of six to 12 months”, contains the textual content of the Law to Guarantee Sexual Freedom accepted in September.
With the contribution of Junts, to this textual content it will likely be added that, “if the sufferer of the crime is a minor or an individual with a incapacity, the higher half of the sentence will likely be utilized”.
During the protection of the initiative, Calvo has referred to as for the necessity for better safety of those teams in conditions that, in his opinion, “are demeaning.” The goal of the proposal, as he has indicated, is to obviously “specify” the applying of the hardest penalties for this crime.