Ana Sandamil apologizes and affirms: “I by no means consciously needed to harm my daughter”

The second trial for the crime of Muimenta ended this Monday. Ana Sandamil, the lady accused of murdering her daughter Desirée Leal, 7, has requested for “pardon” and has assured that she “by no means” needed to “hurt” her daughter “consciously”. And she has requested the favored jury that she “take note of” that she suffered and suffers from “a psychological sickness.”

In the final flip to talk, Sandamil has mentioned “I cherished my daughter very a lot, I by no means consciously needed to harm her”, and has requested for “forgiveness” each from her household and from the “paternal household” of the minor “for the damages brought on”.

“I do not keep in mind something from the evening of the occasions, I do not know what may have occurred,” added the defendant, who requested the court docket: “to take note of that I suffered from a illness, that I undergo from a illness perpetually.”

non-public accusation

In the conclusions, the non-public prosecution has modified them, to incorporate a mitigation of psychological anomaly, since Ana Sandamil “suffered from an unspecified psychotic dysfunction, in addition to a mixed-type character dysfunction”, though “it’s not said that on the time of the crime was affected by any delirium, though her volitional schools had been partially and barely affected”.

The lawyer considers that the defendant “didn’t have her schools affected.” “My opinion is that she acted in chilly blood, there may be nothing extra, ‘I kill her as a result of she is mine'”, she instructed the jury, declaring that it was “as a result of she didn’t need her father to spend extra time along with her”.

“I did not need to share it”

“He killed her as a result of he didn’t need to share her”, this has been the principle argument of the favored accusation, carried out by the Friends of Galicia Foundation, whose lawyer has requested that “justice be accomplished for the daddy” of Desirée.

For this half, which has not modified its conclusions, there may be “ample foundation to point out that Ana Sandamil was completely acutely aware on the day of the occasions” and killed her daughter “in essentially the most vile method attainable: her face.”

The public prosecution believes that the defendant first tried to get the woman to drink a bottle of water with dissolved trazodone however, when she failed, she suffocated her, “urgent her daughter’s nostril for five to 7 minutes”, within the face of protection makes an attempt ” unimaginable” of a “seven-year-old woman for whom her mom is what she loves essentially the most” and who “sleeps in her mattress as a result of she is the one who protects her”.

In her conclusions, the lawyer has requested the jury to “do justice” and “don’t pity Ana Sandamil”, however moderately Father José Manuel Leal.

Desirée, “the one sufferer”

For her half, the prosecutor recalled that “the one sufferer known as Desirée Leal, and he or she is just not right here solely due to her mom’s will”, for which she has requested them that “a monstrosity like this doesn’t go unpunished”.

De Sandamil has mentioned that he acted “with premeditation”, making ready the bottle of water with sedative treatment, and that “he has by no means collaborated with justice.” In addition, he recalled, “she was the final particular person to see her alive and the primary to see her useless” and the phrases she mentioned to her mom on the morning of the occasions, “Desirée died”, decide that “she was conscious” .

For the prosecutor “it was a violent crime” and it was carried out “with treachery.” “He was an grownup in entrance of a kid,” mentioned the prosecutor, and was executed “profiting from the truth that she was alone, in her sleeping mattress”: “Is there anybody extra defenseless than a seven-year-old woman in mattress along with her mom?” , has requested.

Regarding psychological sickness, the prosecutor has appealed to the distinction between a psychiatrist, who “tries to remedy it”, and a forensic physician, “who says that it goes by way of the thoughts of a topic”. “I ought to consider much less within the testimonies which might be primarily based solely on what the defendant says, as a result of I’ve simulation proof,” mentioned the prosecutor, who considers that “there may be premeditation”, “full consciousness” of what occurred and “simulation of signs”, along with a “sole imputability report” that signifies that there’s “no connection” between his psychological sickness and the details.

The protection requests psychiatric admission

Faced with the request for everlasting reviewable jail from the opposite events, Ana Sandamil’s protection requests that she be admitted to a psychiatric jail, provided that “her psychological schools had been very altered” on the time of the occasions.

The protection lawyer has assured that each the psychiatrists and psychologists who handled her after the occasions within the HULA and the jail psychiatrist have endorsed the state of “psychosis” and “dissociative amnesia”, one thing that “can’t be verified that it’s not like this”, since psychometric checks “solely give suspicions, not certainties”.

“In the opinion” of the scientific docs who handled her, the lawyer added, the defendant “was telling the reality” and “the psychotic sickness is there.” “At this level, nobody denies it. We solely have psychological sickness as a proof for the woman’s dying.”