Vicente Fernández, a non-attached deputy in Les Corts after leaving the Cs group, has filed a criticism with the TSJCV for Puig’s standing as registered The criticism is filed for the fee of attainable crimes of embezzlement and prevarication The former vp of the Consell confirmed in an interview tv firm that expenses 1,300 euros a month for unemployment
Vicente Fernández, non-attached deputy in Les Corts after leaving the Cs group, has denounced the ‘president’ of the Generalitat Valenciana, Ximo Puig, and the previous vp Mónica Oltra for attainable crimes of embezzlement and prevarication, contemplating that the Official Newspaper of the Generalitat (DOGV) revealed her departure as a dismissal and never a resignation to permit her to gather unemployment.
In the letter, superior by the newspaper ‘Las Provincias’, the parliamentarian and likewise a lawyer argues that Puig, “forgetting Oltra’s public resignation”, agreed by decree to his “political dismissal”, which in his opinion made attainable an equal to dismissal with the correct to unemployment, in addition to “attainable compensation from the Consell that must be verified, when they didn’t legally belong to it.”
“Is she or the ‘president’ mendacity? Why do eight days move from the announcement of the resignation to the publication of the decree?”, the non-attached individual asks himself in statements to Europa Press, to denounce that “any Spaniard from a foot” could be denied the correct to unemployment after having resigned.
Catalá warns of “authorized penalties” for Puig
In this regard, at a press convention after the board of trustees in Les Corts, Mª José Catalá (PP) has demanded that Puig “present his face” and clarify why within the decision for the departure of Oltra from the Consell it was not specified that It was “at his personal request”, when he recalled that he was included in that of former second vp Rubén Martínez Dalmau.
He has maintained that it was “in order that this woman might accumulate unemployment, with all of the authorized penalties that it may possibly entail like Puig”, along with insisting that the interview harmed each the ‘president’ and Compromís and “herself”.
In addition, Catalá has affirmed that “everybody in Compromís can really feel very recognized” with Oltra’s interview, whom he has accused of “persevering with to lie” and of not assuming political duties when in his coalition they have been “the primary to demand it”.
As deputy spokesperson for Cs, Mamen Peris has dismissed the previous vp’s statements as “patochada” and has accused her of “making a parallel trial”, for which she has indicated that if she have been her lawyer she wouldn’t have suggested her to take action. In reality, she has indicated that the investigating decide of the method might request a replica of the interview as a result of she “provides contradictory information once more.”
And José Mª Llanos (Vox) has assured that “all of Oltra’s steps are designed for his profit” and that “he doesn’t resist dwelling off politics” whereas “nobody dares to board the sunken ship of Compromís”.
Barcelo: “Things could have been achieved nicely”
Among the teams of the Botànic, the socialist Ana Barceló has been positive that “issues could have been achieved nicely” within the decision on the resignation of Oltra, though she has remarked that she doesn’t know extra particulars.
He has dominated out that it’s akin to his scenario, since he stopped being Minister of Health to imagine the parliamentary spokesperson for the PSPV, as a result of “there was no interval to deal with the difficulty of unemployment.”
Papi Robles (Compromís) has proven his assist for Oltra, stating that every one folks have the correct to politics “and never solely those that don’t want it to stay”, for which he has urged the PP to deal with making opposition.
“They actually need to intimidate us, however we’ll proceed with our heads held excessive: we’ve zero convicted and others just like the PP at 136,” he careworn, including that his group publishes what’s listed on its transparency portal whereas “some trustee has not clarified what he expenses”.
His colleague Carles Esteve has invited the non-attached deputy who has filed the criticism to “waste time if he needs to”, along with emphasizing that “in 99% of circumstances he votes the identical as the acute proper” and making certain that “SEPE (Servicio State Employment Public) doesn’t discriminate between one formulation and one other for cessation”.
“Oltra is and can be a political reference”
“Oltra has been is and can be a political reference even past Compromís”, he has claimed, though he has identified that they weren’t shocked by the interview as a result of “he has given many explanations” in Les Corts and contributed “little information”.
Meanwhile, the Unides Podem trustee, Pilar Lima, didn’t need to reply questions in regards to the departure of Dalmau and Oltra from the Valencian authorities: “We don’t have anything to touch upon, we’re not going to enter.”