The majority affiliation of judges proclaims that on Tuesday it won’t signal with Justice the rise of 450 euros


He assures that the settlement is “inadequate, unworthy and unacceptable” and “will crush the financial capability of the judges for a few years” This is how the APM pronounced itself this Friday in an announcement after yesterday, on the finish of the fifth assembly of the Remuneration Table, assured that it was nonetheless within the negotiation section. In an 11-page assertion, the affiliation has indicated that it’ll not signal “for varied causes”

The Professional Association of the Magistracy (APM), nearly all of judges, has introduced that on Tuesday it would distance itself from the opposite six associations and won’t signal the settlement with Justice — which contemplates an increase of 450 euros monthly that will likely be utilized to his whole judicial and prosecutorial career–because he considers it “inadequate, unworthy and unacceptable” and, in his opinion, “it would crush the financial capability of judges for a few years.”

This is how the APM pronounced itself this Friday in an announcement after yesterday, on the finish of the fifth assembly of the Remuneration Table, it assured that it was nonetheless within the negotiation section, that it didn’t rule out any state of affairs and that till the second of signing there was “time to carry positions nearer.”

In an 11-page assertion, the affiliation has indicated that it’ll not signal “for varied causes.” “The resolution that now we have adopted has not been simple, we all know that it’s a compromised resolution and, certainly, tough for some to grasp, however now we have accomplished it from the conviction that it’s a disastrous settlement for all of us, which we are going to quickly remorse and that hurts deeply and for a very long time our remuneration system”, they’ve identified from the APM.

Although six of the seven associations have agreed to the proposal, solely two of them — Judges and Judges for Democracy (JJpD) and the Progressive Union of Prosecutors (UPF), each progressive in nature — have been glad with the supply. .

The different 4 –Francisco de Vitoria Judicial Association (AJFV), Independent Judicial Forum (FJI), Association of Prosecutors (AF) and Professional and Independent Association of Prosecutors (APIF)– have assured that “the proposal is under no circumstances passable “, which doesn’t meet their “reliable financial calls for and which doesn’t meet the “wants for funding in technique of Justice that residents demand”.

Topics