Before the decide within the case, she maintained that she was even afraid of being attacked in the course of the road: “And if I depart right here now and once I depart they catch us or one thing?” The participant’s protection factors out these phrases, contemplating that they aren’t suitable with the photographs from safety camerasIn her judicial assertion, the younger lady additionally assured that the 2 have been “very far aside” earlier than getting into the toilet the place the alleged aggression came about
This model, which for the sufferer justifies the explanation why he didn’t depart that non-public room regardless of the rejection and even the concern attributable to the footballer’s habits moments earlier than the alleged aggression, serves the protection in the identical approach to make sure that there are elements of his testimony which are diametrically contradicted by what the photographs from the native safety cameras present. This Friday, the decide will take a press release from a number of of the employees on the nightclub the place the occasions allegedly came about, as witnesses and with the intention of studying extra particulars in regards to the moments earlier than and after.
This testimony of the sufferer would come to delve into a facet already raised by her in her criticism earlier than the Mossos d’Esquadra: that Dani Alves allegedly went astray along with her mates earlier than she was attacked within the lavatory, even placing his hand of the ladies on his penis with out his consent whereas they have been within the sales space.
This side results in the next query, verbalized by the participant’s protection and which shall be one other of the central components in attempting to weaken the complainant’s testimony. If Dani Alves was harassing the ladies, why did the sufferer go into that rest room with him? Before the Mossos, the younger lady defined that she didn’t know that it was a rest room, and he or she thought that it was the entry door to a different personal room. In her assertion earlier than the decide, she additionally tried to clarify that she acted out of concern and on the soccer participant’s insistence. It is what is understood in authorized terminology as “environmental intimidation”.
some white sneakers
However, the attraction filed by Alves’ protection immediately questions this level, contemplating that the photographs from the safety cameras present that neither the footballer and the sufferer have been separated from the remainder of these current, nor was there a state of affairs of domination or concern. purpose. In reality, the authorized staff that poor the soccer participant maintains that she voluntarily enters the toilet two minutes after the athlete does. Before the decide, she maintained once more that it was Alves who opened the door for her and insisted that she enter.
In reality, right here comes one other of the weather that shall be central to the investigation: the presence of Alves or not at that door. After the temporary offered by Alves’ protection, La Vanguardia introduced that in line with the sufferer’s model, the participant could be in a blind spot within the space, behind the door, however that his white footwear are seen because of the reflection of a mirror. It is foreseeable that whereas his protection makes an effort to show that this shoe belongs to a different particular person, the investigators and the prosecution will attempt to affirm that it belongs to Dani Alves, which might place him behind that door and ensure the sufferer’s model once more.